Re: biying
💗0
Date: 5th Mar 2005
This is a thread that should remain buried - it's not a good idea for you to keep bringing it back to the top of the list as people will come to the conclusion that you are trying to stir a hornets nest....
So lets leave it to die this time and not bring this back again.
So lets leave it to die this time and not bring this back again.
Re: biying
💗0
Date: 5th Mar 2005
I couldn't agree more with Footsie.
Why can't everyone now accept that there are some of us who love to see a woman taking off her riding boots to reveal long thick socks underneath.
This is a specific preference - IT IS RIDICULOUS TO SUGGEST THAT WE SHOULD GO TO A SITE JUST ABOUT SOCKS - IF WE WANTED THAT, WE'D LOOK AT THE SOCK-SHOP WEBSITE!
Let's agree to 'live and let live' - we all love riding boots, it's just that some of us like various other things worn with them, too.
END THIS NONSENSICAL ROW NOW - PLEASE.
Why can't everyone now accept that there are some of us who love to see a woman taking off her riding boots to reveal long thick socks underneath.
This is a specific preference - IT IS RIDICULOUS TO SUGGEST THAT WE SHOULD GO TO A SITE JUST ABOUT SOCKS - IF WE WANTED THAT, WE'D LOOK AT THE SOCK-SHOP WEBSITE!
Let's agree to 'live and let live' - we all love riding boots, it's just that some of us like various other things worn with them, too.
END THIS NONSENSICAL ROW NOW - PLEASE.
Re: biying
💗0
Date: 5th Mar 2005
It ended two months ago (check the posting dates) - the last thing I wanted was for it to be brought back and hence my previous post as it's only going to cause trouble again - your last post Col being a prime example of what I wanted to avoid, as this thread didn't become inflamed over the socks row, but after what I considered a personal attack on myself.
Re: biying
💗0
Date: 6th Mar 2005
whusent gurieping a boght whight socks just the uthers sight i cant feggur out whoe thaer posting whurcks the biching we all ded a few muthes back fill it forget it i just thught thaier sund be a spot to guriepe
Login to reply