biying

gee enny buntty biying rumbuer or letheur ridding boots for cxes

Please write in english.

if you ask me, this guy is doing it on purpose (writing in gibberish!!). It's time for the webmaster to take action and expel him from the forum... there should be some bi-laws for these forums as he's wasting all members a lot of time (and money!). It's really amazing how some people hv time to do funny things..... don't they need to find money for bread??

*yawn*
Maybe one of the other bi-laws should be to ban people who keep bringing up that infuriating topic on 'stinky white socks' too. So where will it end?
Does it really waste that much time on your life? Must be quite dull then if it affects you that much? As for wasting money - these forums are free, you don't need to be a paid member to use them! Anyways from previous posts, I do believe 'g boots' is already (or was) a paid memember ;)

Right, REDCOAT! The socks gang should have their own web site. As a matter of fact there are a few such sites, so why post here?

gee now one got boots as a gifed nag nag nag nag

yeah, maybe another by-law should be to ban "double or triple" profiles on this forum....... some like socks some like it bare some like it in complete dress and jods.....etc etc. this is not the issue here, so why the attack here? Are you THE FAMOUS g boots here, why are you so annoyed at sticky white socks?? I can say the same for yucky barefoot too!!

gee it the sex feditshe coweplae sight whell double got into it wheth the white socks and i jumped into it aevelley my humer wos not aepesheaghted and for the billinthe time my spelling sucks big time

Footsie - stop throwing your rattle out of your pram every time you don't get your own way.
You make it quite clear that you want your stinky white socks on this website, several of us have stated that we don't - this is a forum to express our opinion, so why are you afraid of ours? For the record, I do not have an alter-ego on this forum. If it bothers you that much - why not ask the webmaster to check my IP address (I suspect we're on different sides of the atlantic judging by the time difference in posting), so please be a good chap, stop embarassing yourself, lets have less of the unfounded speculations and pipe down.

thats telling hem whight sockes go get pizze and dont get enny soses on the letter or rubber boots

The people that find socks so delightful should go to the many sock sites. I for one DOTE on woman wearing RIDING BOOTS! I have never given socks or bare feet too much thought. However the woman's bare feet on the LEATHER)) BOOT socks are another story. They can be cute and fun to look at. However not a fetish.
It does look like this "subject" will die hard.
See YOU elsewhere, REDCOAT!

thats telling hem to

Annoyed and DEFINITELY NOT EMBARRASSED?? (why should I be). As you said, everyone's entitled to their opinions and preferences. If you're not a double, maybe you should keep quiet..... no need to be nasty if you're indeed a gentleman??

mr.double b IS mr.double b.!! Still do not know why sock lovers are here?
I for one would never, go to a sock site and campaign for RIDING BOOTS!
Embarrassed? Opinion and preferences, of course, ALL should. But why on earth do sock lovers spend time here??
g boots and mr.double b are TWO different people! Two that like MANY others LOVE to see woman wearing RIDING BOOTS and few do that better then RIDINGBOOTS.NET!
I am sure you, footsie, will keep this up. YOU and I on other sites SEEM to be in agreement?? Strange? Are, YOU of TWO minds??

There are ridingboot AND sock lovers in this fetish world, not just me. Ever care to think that quite a few female ridingboot lovers DO like to wear socks underneath, and not every woman wears boots in the bare!! It's a matter of taste and preference. Maybe you don't agree, but Ridingboots and socks are part of the same footgear wardrobe, just like shirt and tie, savvy? Amen!

BTW, I'm NOT campaigning for socks here, don't get me wrong. Just mentioning my preferences for the webbo who IS still inviting people to write in with the type of photos they wish to see (a wish list so to speak), in case you haven't noticed. Also, while you Mr double b, might be able to tolerate gibberish on websites, I ,for one, do not!

not all sex feditshes ar happey

Outside of the show ring, many.too many woman that ride wear long socks and the G.D. riding shoes! The shoes are so easy to shuck, why not ask for riding shoes? I still think YOU are more for the socks then the BOOTS, even if YOU say so on other sites. "proper" riding attire is set by the show ring and hunt clubs. Hacking, is wear what you like. Have seen riders in overalls! Many a business, and this IS a business, has started selling one thing and switched to an other, while still using the same name. Will that happen here? I for one hope not! YOU, seem to think I am out to get YOU! Not at all. YOUR, FETISH IS YOURS. My fetish is mine. We disagree,so be it.
HAPPY 2005

thurow a pier of whight socks in to a taeck room and look out the riding curop fedeshes ar aeftuer you thene the hunt top boot ones ar up sent that gent the ruber boot pepull going thene the jumprs carrownd got going thene munddey boots giy on a ranpghe i ded stort a spot for every one to go off on it cind of funny i mand the sinmpleds in punt lick ded enny one gent riding boot as i gefd and evrey buntty whent off the deep end my selling the whight socke debaeght and these one siecking up[ for that one or me aegurring ok her we go rownd zellen

I know most people are no doubt fed up of this thread, but I feel I need to defend myself from Footsie's attacks on me... again.

Haven't you crawled back from under the rock you came from yet?
You're annoyed?!!! You accuse me without any shred of proof to be someone who posts on this forum with an alter ego for the sole purpose of being a nuisance. I 'called' your lies, refusing to stand by while you attempt to slur my name as you expected - that's why you should be embarassed (anything else you'd like me to spoon feed you with?).

I am indeed a great gentlemen to a vast majority, but then that requires that I be treated in the same manner for which quite obviously you haven't. You rightly reap what you sow.

Mr Double B - as usual, I totally agree with everything in your last post. Long may this site continue without diversifying and diluting the theme of this site.

Strange, footie, shows a different side on other sites? Indeed this "debate" could go on like old man river. I for one think this sock thing, was stated to strongly by some. I never gave a second thought to the girls wearing socks or stocking. Am I wrong, or do most of the people here LOVE to see woman wearing RIDING BOOTS? Seeing the BOOTS on the floor or on a bed and not worn by the woman is for me a big turn off! I am aware that "all" tastes satisfied makes for a good bottom line. I am sure the sock people have been heard!
I use other names on other sites, but do NOT fly TWO flags on ANY.

gee enny buntty biying rumbuer or letheur ridding boots for cxes

So are you mentally retarded, or just ignorant?
Minnesota, and you can't write or spell?

yes you got that right and shove a boot tow up yure ass for the mn insolledt

"Maybe one of the other bi-laws should be to ban people who keep bringing up that infuriating topic on 'stinky white socks' too. So where will it end?"

Hey redcoat, maybe you have a short memory, but it was YOU who accused me first...... all I did was to protest the gibberish that keeps appearing here, apparently written by someone who mr Garvin puts it "is either mentally retarded or ignorant". It was You who pinpointed me by saying bad things about sock fetish people! To be fair, did I ever say anything to sugget this site should "ban those who talk about barefeet in ridingboots, or come out and express negatively about other fetish preferences?? As I said before, everyone's entitled to their opinion and tastes, but you appear to be annoyed by other people's fetish taste to the point you come out openly and express annoyance at a fellow member?? Of all people, YOU SHOULD BE EMBARRASSED, NOT ME!! Funny enough, but sounds to me Dr Jeckl and Mr Hyde is running wild on this post......... Maybe it's time you go crawling and find Mr Hyde and go mind your own business IF you're a true gentlemen, i/o of picking up fights again when this post is dying down........ and yes, no gentleman on this earth will use insulting words like you!! Indeed, there's no need to DEFEND yourself if you didn't pick a fight or attack others in the first place!

BTW, are you and this mr g "gibberish" boots cousins or what??? why are you defending him so much?? Like mr double b, this topic should die down by now!

"shove a boot tow up yure ass for the mn insolledt"... Hooray for the mentally insane people on this earth!!

Let us ALL! join Custer at the Little Big Horn and go down with our BOOTS ON!!)))

right on gland it the net you stick up for me and ill keep a gureeing wheth you how send how shure bellt up a lot of aepenne

So footsie, I was the first to get all stroppy eh?
Well let's both take a look down memory lane shall we.

Your first post started with your demand to have 'G Boots' banned, as some reason he was wasting your time (and money somehow - still haven't figured that one out). Then you attempted some humour (I think attempted is the key word here), something to do with earning money for bread whatever that punchline is.

So I responded to your post. The *yawn* thing was about for again someone asking 'G Boots' to be banned solely because he presumeably has Dyslexia and doesn't use a spell checker. I found this view very narrow minded and so responded to try and highlight the fact that everyone has different views, like my view on your white socks and so as I said 'Where will all this banning end?' Again I pointed out and asked why you think 'G Boots' has such a large impact on your life as I (and I'm sure others) have no idea why you think he does?

Your responce to my perfectly reasonable post and questions, was to simlply make a direct attack on me ignoring what I posted, accusing me of having an alter ego who was doing nothing more than cause trouble on here. I refuse to let you try to smear me like that with no grounds of evidence what-so-ever, just because by not responding you admitted that I had a point and so I had every perfect right to repond to you the way I did after that. So as before, I have no need to be embarassed but feel you have more than a little 'egg on face' (which grows with every post you make on here). Just a shame you're the only one not seeing it?

I refuse to be apologetic in anyway as quite clearly you were quite personal on your attack on me without any grounds for it.

Again for me, it's about the breeches and long boots, I don't give a damn about whether she's bare foot or wearing 10 pairs of winter woolen socks under them, as does Mr Double B and G Boots (I believe?)

right

Gee, REDCOAT, here all the time I was told I was g boots?? Guess we ALL are!???

lick enny place the nuts aer evrry where whie wood the net be enny defrent at leesd the nunt s purobby whent some plaes elles lick may be a whight socke barefeet sight

boy the postting her a lot ezeur thene the jompure seght i whent be buthering theme wheth my spelling dont have a colw how thers woocks