Ridingboots fetish

who are they ?

💗0

who are they ? 9417-who-are-they--.jpg

Re: who are they ?

💗0
Wish i new
Like the one on the left

Re: who are they ?

💗0
well, thats Zara on the left, her mother in the centre, and two models from a mag

Re: who are they ?

💗0
Aren't you the clever one

Re: who are they ?

💗0
ya but i took the pic from an article in a UK mag that said so

Re: who are they ?

💗0
I'll take the two on the right.

Re: who are they ?

💗0
Zara, Mum, Laura Renwick and Georgie Strutton



http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/femail/article-1036563/Forgotten-jodhpurs-girls-Showjumping-makes-desperate-bid-new-21st-Century-image.html

Please Put Your Riding Breeches Back On

💗0
Thanks for the website link Utheni.

In my opinion I would had preferred it if sexy Laura and gorgeous Georgie had kept their exquisitely tight fitting riding breeches left on during the photoshoot.

It leaves alot more to the imagination, but having said that they are still both incredibly sexy.

Re: who are they ?

💗0
me, i will take old Annie in the centre, always liked her.

Re: Please Put Your Riding Breeches Back On

💗0
Some more traditional pics of Laura & Georgie:
Laura Renwick Currently ranked 10th in BSJA riders table-

Barclays Bank pulled their sponsorshi[p deal from the Chester competition over the photo shoot
Re: Please Put Your Riding Breeches Back On 9879-re--please-put-your-riding-breeches-back-on.jpg
Re: Please Put Your Riding Breeches Back On 9880-re--please-put-your-riding-breeches-back-on.jpg
Re: Please Put Your Riding Breeches Back On 9881-re--please-put-your-riding-breeches-back-on.jpg
Re: Please Put Your Riding Breeches Back On 9882-re--please-put-your-riding-breeches-back-on.jpg
Re: Please Put Your Riding Breeches Back On 9883-re--please-put-your-riding-breeches-back-on.jpg

Barclays Bank Must Be Corporate Spoilsports

💗0
Some really nice photographs of both "Luscious Laura" and "Gorgeous Georgie" kindly posted by EQL.

If Barclays Bank have really withdrawn their financial sponsorship to the Chester showjumping event then they are nothing more than corporate spoilsports.

The editor at the Mail On Sunday should had insisted upon however that the two incredibly sexy looking girls kept their skin tight riding breeches on for all the pictures shot during the glamour model photoshoot.

Not only in my opinion would they both have appeared to be even more sexually alluring, but all the totally unnecessary and stupid comments about "dergrading and sexist" photographs would never have arisen.

But what are your views on this subject matter?

Sitting Pretty.
Barclays Bank Must Be Corporate Spoilsports 9884-barclays-bank-must-be-corporate-spoilsports.jpg
Barclays Bank Must Be Corporate Spoilsports 9885-barclays-bank-must-be-corporate-spoilsports.jpg

Re: who are they ?

💗0
There's been a lot of commentary on these on equestrian (non-fetish) sites. Some people think they look awful, others are unbothered. It's been pointed out that the Daily Mail seems either not to know what Photoshop is, or was determined to make the models look bad. This is the paper (UK), after all, that loves to point out cellulite in celebrities' legs. A 'friendly' photoshoot would at least have used make up or retouching on the skin.

I think the women were pretty naive, but there have been a number of charity calendars in recent years in which riders stripped off, and they probably saw this shoot as being no different.

The contrast with them in their show clothing, mounted, is really striking. Maybe that's the intended message? As one who likes pictures of real riders more than glamour shots, I'd have to agree, but maybe not with the way it was put across.
Login to reply
Copyright. ©UKInet

Don't like memberships? Buy our fetish videos and fetish images at Fetishtokens.com