Re: who are they ?
💗0
Date: 31st Jul 2008
well, thats Zara on the left, her mother in the centre, and two models from a mag
Re: who are they ?
💗0
Date: 31st Jul 2008
ya but i took the pic from an article in a UK mag that said so
Re: who are they ?
💗0
Date: 31st Jul 2008
Zara, Mum, Laura Renwick and Georgie Strutton
http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/femail/article-1036563/Forgotten-jodhpurs-girls-Showjumping-makes-desperate-bid-new-21st-Century-image.html
http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/femail/article-1036563/Forgotten-jodhpurs-girls-Showjumping-makes-desperate-bid-new-21st-Century-image.html
Please Put Your Riding Breeches Back On
💗0
Date: 31st Jul 2008
Thanks for the website link Utheni.
In my opinion I would had preferred it if sexy Laura and gorgeous Georgie had kept their exquisitely tight fitting riding breeches left on during the photoshoot.
It leaves alot more to the imagination, but having said that they are still both incredibly sexy.
In my opinion I would had preferred it if sexy Laura and gorgeous Georgie had kept their exquisitely tight fitting riding breeches left on during the photoshoot.
It leaves alot more to the imagination, but having said that they are still both incredibly sexy.
Re: who are they ?
💗0
Date: 31st Jul 2008
me, i will take old Annie in the centre, always liked her.
Re: Please Put Your Riding Breeches Back On
💗0
Date: 31st Aug 2008
Some more traditional pics of Laura & Georgie:
Laura Renwick Currently ranked 10th in BSJA riders table-
Barclays Bank pulled their sponsorshi[p deal from the Chester competition over the photo shoot
Laura Renwick Currently ranked 10th in BSJA riders table-
Barclays Bank pulled their sponsorshi[p deal from the Chester competition over the photo shoot
Barclays Bank Must Be Corporate Spoilsports
💗0
Date: 31st Aug 2008
Some really nice photographs of both "Luscious Laura" and "Gorgeous Georgie" kindly posted by EQL.
If Barclays Bank have really withdrawn their financial sponsorship to the Chester showjumping event then they are nothing more than corporate spoilsports.
The editor at the Mail On Sunday should had insisted upon however that the two incredibly sexy looking girls kept their skin tight riding breeches on for all the pictures shot during the glamour model photoshoot.
Not only in my opinion would they both have appeared to be even more sexually alluring, but all the totally unnecessary and stupid comments about "dergrading and sexist" photographs would never have arisen.
But what are your views on this subject matter?
Sitting Pretty.
If Barclays Bank have really withdrawn their financial sponsorship to the Chester showjumping event then they are nothing more than corporate spoilsports.
The editor at the Mail On Sunday should had insisted upon however that the two incredibly sexy looking girls kept their skin tight riding breeches on for all the pictures shot during the glamour model photoshoot.
Not only in my opinion would they both have appeared to be even more sexually alluring, but all the totally unnecessary and stupid comments about "dergrading and sexist" photographs would never have arisen.
But what are your views on this subject matter?
Sitting Pretty.
Re: who are they ?
💗0
Date: 1st Sep 2008
There's been a lot of commentary on these on equestrian (non-fetish) sites. Some people think they look awful, others are unbothered. It's been pointed out that the Daily Mail seems either not to know what Photoshop is, or was determined to make the models look bad. This is the paper (UK), after all, that loves to point out cellulite in celebrities' legs. A 'friendly' photoshoot would at least have used make up or retouching on the skin.
I think the women were pretty naive, but there have been a number of charity calendars in recent years in which riders stripped off, and they probably saw this shoot as being no different.
The contrast with them in their show clothing, mounted, is really striking. Maybe that's the intended message? As one who likes pictures of real riders more than glamour shots, I'd have to agree, but maybe not with the way it was put across.
I think the women were pretty naive, but there have been a number of charity calendars in recent years in which riders stripped off, and they probably saw this shoot as being no different.
The contrast with them in their show clothing, mounted, is really striking. Maybe that's the intended message? As one who likes pictures of real riders more than glamour shots, I'd have to agree, but maybe not with the way it was put across.
Login to reply